Neonatal diabetes with a rare LRBA mutation

  1. Arti Yadav 1,
  2. Rakesh Kumar 1,
  3. Amit Rawat 2 and
  4. Radha Venkatesan 3
  1. 1 Endocrinology and Diabetes Unit, Dpeartment of Paediatrics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
  2. 2 Pediatric Allergy and Immunology Unit, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
  3. 3 Molecular Genetics, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  1. Correspondence to Prof Rakesh Kumar; drrakesh.pgi@gmail.com

Publication history

Accepted:02 Nov 2022
First published:24 Nov 2022
Online issue publication:24 Nov 2022

Case reports

Case reports are not necessarily evidence-based in the same way that the other content on BMJ Best Practice is. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice. Please check the date of publication.

Abstract

Neonatal diabetes mellitus (NDM) is characterised by onset of persistent hyperglycaemia within the first 6 months of life. NDM is frequently caused by a mutation in a single gene affecting pancreatic beta cell function. We report an infant, born to a non-consanguineous couple, who presented with osmotic symptoms and diabetic ketoacidosis. The genetic analysis showed a mutation in LRBA (lipopolysaccharide-responsive and beige-like anchor protein) gene. We highlight the importance of considering genetic analysis in every infant with NDM, to understand the nature of genetic mutation, associated comorbidities, response to glibenclamide and future prognosis.

Background

Neonatal diabetes mellitus (NDM) is a monogenic form of diabetes mellitus. Infants most often present within first 6 months of life and occasionally up to 12 months of life. NDM is caused by one of more than 25 identified genetic mutations. It can be transient or permanent. Clinical subtypes and associated features depend on specific gene mutation. Infants with NDM can present with incidentally noted hyperglycaemia or symptomatic with dehydration, low birth weight, failure to thrive, glucosuria, ketoacidosis and osmotic diuresis.1 The aetiological diagnosis is confirmed when genetic testing identifies a causative gene mutation.

Case presentation

An infant presented with increased demand for breast feeds and frequency of micturition for 20 days. He was born to a non-consanguineous marriage, at term gestation with normal birth weight (2500 g), had a smooth perinatal transition and exclusively breast fed since birth. At admission to local hospital, he was diagnosed to have NDM (blood glucose, 571 mg/dL) with severe diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) (venous pH, 7.01; bicarbonate, 4.6; blood beta-hydroxy butyrate, >3 mmol/L) and urinary tract infection (UTI). DKA was managed with intravenous fluid and regular insulin infusion. UTI was treated with intravenous antibiotics for 7 days at local hospital. The infant was shifted to subcutaneous regular insulin every 6 hours on day 4 of hospital stay. At admission to our hospital, the infant had stable vitals at presentation with normal haemodynamics. He was underweight (5.1 kg), with normal length (60 cm) and head circumference (41 cm). The systemic examination was normal.

Investigations

At admission to our hospital, the infant had a normal haemogram, platelet and differential leucocyte count. Renal and liver function tests were within normal limits. His venous blood pH and bicarbonate levels were normal (after receiving treatment for DKA at local hospital). C reactive protein was negative. Urine and blood cultures were sterile (after receiving intravenous antibiotics for 7 days at local hospital). He had elevated glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) with low C peptide. Pancreatic autoantibodies testing revealed positive anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase-65 antibody. Ultrasonography of cranium and urinary system was normal. Immunological work-up done was normal. Laboratory investigations are summarised in table 1.

Table 1

Relevant laboratory investigations of the index infant at 4 months of age

Investigation Reference value Result*
*Results in bold refer to abnormal values.
Serum metabolic profile
Na (mmol/L) 135–145 137
K (mmol/L) 3.5–5 4.1
Cl (mEq/L) 96–106 102
Urea (mg/dL) 10–50 11
Creatinine (mg/dL) 0.5–1.2 0.25
Ca (mg/dL) 8.8–10.2 9.8
PO4 (mg/dL) 2.7–4.5 3.6
CRP (mg/L) 0.5-3.5 0.14
pH 7.35–7.45 7.39
HCO3 22–29 24.8
Urine routine
Sugar/protein Nil/Nil
Leucocytes Absent
Red Blood Cells Absent
Hormonal Assays (Serum)
TSH (μIU/mL) 0.27–4.2 1.4
Total T3 (ng/mL) 0.8–2.0 2.03
Total T4 (μg/dL) 4.8–12.7 7.9
C peptide (ng/mL) 1.1–4.4 0.105
HbA1c (%) <5.7 9.6
Vitamin D (ng/mL) 11–43 46.7
Anti-GAD-65 Positive
IAA/IA2 Negative
Immunological work-up at 10 months of age
Lymphocyte subset
Absolute lymphocyte count 2600–10 400 6403
% of CD3+ (T lymphocyte) 54%–76% (1600–6700) 67% (4323)
% of CD19+ (B lymphocyte) 15%–39% (602–2700) 22% (1407)
% of CD56+ (NK lymphocyte) 3%–17% (200–1200) 6.3% (407)
T lymphocyte subset
% of CD3+ (T lymphocyte) 54%–76% 66.96%
% of CD3+CD4+ (TH lymphocyte) 31%–54% 65.78%
% of CD3+CD8+ (TC lymphocyte) 12%–28% 30.6%
CD4/CD8 ratio 1.3%–3.9% 2.14:1%
Immunophenotyping for T reg cells
% of CD4+ (TH lymphocyte) 42.75% of lymphocytes 40%
% of CD4+CD127+CD25+ 3.63% of CD4+cells 3.32%

Differential diagnosis

In general, neonatal hyperglycaemia is secondary to an underlying clinical condition, rather than a specific disorder of glucose metabolism. Common causes of neonatal hyperglycaemia can be parenteral administration of glucose, prematurity, sepsis, stress response and drugs. However, in the index infant above causes were ruled out based on history, examination and lab investigations. After ruling out the common causes and due to persistence of hyperglycaemia requiring insulin, diagnosis of NDM was considered. Once the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus is made in an infant, targeted genetic testing to confirm and identify a monogenic aetiology is recommended. The genetic testing in the index infant was performed at research laboratory in Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, which use a screening panel including 36 genes associated with neonatal and other forms of monogenic diabetes. Direct sequencing by Sanger method revealed a homozygous single base deletion in exon 23 of the LRBA gene on chromosome 4. This defect results in a frame-shift and premature truncation of the protein 2 amino acids downstream to codon 1198. Both the parents of the infant were found to be the carrier of the same gene mutation.

Treatment

The infant was initially started on basal-bolus (lispro-glargine) regimen of insulin. Subsequently, glibenclamide trial was started, and long-acting insulin was stopped according to protocol. The dose of glibenclamide was hiked gradually, reaching a maximum dose of 3 mg/kg/day on day 15 of hospital stay. However, there was no response to glibenclamide even after continuing maximum dose for 4 weeks. Glibenclamide was stopped in view of no response and basal-bolus regimen was continued. Bolus insulin (lispro) was replaced by regular insulin, keeping the frequent feeding pattern of the infant and longer duration of action of regular insulin as compared with lispro. Parents were taught blood glucose testing, insulin titration as per sugar records, management of hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia at home. He was discharged on exclusive breast feeding and basal-bolus (regular-glargine) regimen of insulin. Parents were told about desired blood glucose levels (70–180 mg/dL) with a target HbA1c of <7.5% in follow-up.

Outcome and follow-up

The infant was doing well at first follow-up 20 days after discharge. Parents were doing capillary blood glucose of the infant four times daily with insulin dose titration as per glucose records. Infant was continued on basal-bolus regimen of insulin, exclusive breast feeding until 6 months of age with vitamin D supplementation. As per the diabetes log maintained by parents, nearly, 60% of blood glucose records were within the target range (70–180 mg/dL). He was seen subsequently at the age of 9 months when nearly 50% blood glucose records were in range with HbA1c of 9%. His thyroid function test, immunological work-up and coeliac serology done at the age of 10 months (table 1) was normal. Parents were advised to continue basal-bolus regimen and 3 monthly follow-ups with HbA1c.

Discussion

NDM is the commonly used term to describe monogenic forms of diabetes which typically present within the first 6 months of life.2 Index case presented at around 3 months of age. For infants with persistent hyperglycaemia including those with NDM, management is initially directed towards correction of fluid and electrolyte abnormalities and reduction of hyperglycaemia by the administration of a continuous infusion of intravenous insulin and fluids.3 The index infant presented with severe DKA to a local hospital and was managed appropriately. At admission to our hospital, there was no DKA (normal blood pH, ketones and bicarbonate); hence, infant was started on breast feeding and subcutaneous insulin therapy (basal-bolus regimen).

After stabilisation on insulin therapy and in absence of pancreatic hypoplasia/aplasia, consanguinity or syndromic features, empiric trial of oral sulfonylurea is recommended while awaiting genetic test results.4 Index infant was started on glibenclamide trial (while insulin was continued) on day 3 of hospital stay, discontinued after nearly 4 weeks, in view of no response. Infant was discharged on basal-bolus (glargine-regular) regimen of insulin with a plan to collect the report of genetic testing in follow-up.

Genetic testing of the index infant revealed homozygous single base deletion in exon 23 of the LRBA (lipopolysaccharide-responsive and beige-like anchor protein) gene. This mutation results in a frameshift and premature truncation of the protein 2 amino acids downstream to codon 1198 (p.Gln1198LysfsTer2). Both parents were found to be heterozygous for the same variant.

LRBA deficiency results in decreased frequency, aberrant phenotype and decreased suppressive function of regulatory-T cells (Treg). Treg cell depletion in patients with LRBA deficiency is compounded by impaired Treg cell phenotype and function, with decreased expression of key effector proteins involved in Treg cell suppression, such as CD25 and CTLA-4.5 LRBA localises to cytosol at lysosomes, the trans-Golgi network, the endoplasmic reticulum, the perinuclear endoplasmic reticulum and endocytic vacuoles.6 Mechanisms by which LRBA deficiency impairs mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) activation can involve defective autophagy.7 The lymphocyte subset, T lymphocyte subset and immunophenotyping of Treg cells done at the age of 9 months in the index infant were normal as of now, however, can evolve over time.

The clinical features observed in patients with LRBA deficiency are heterogeneous with age of presentation ranging from 2 months to 12 years. LRBA deficiency is characterised as early-onset hypogammaglobulinaemia, autoimmune manifestations, susceptibility to inflammatory bowel disease and recurrent infection.7 The disease phenotype can broadly be divided into an enteropathy phenotype, an autoimmunity phenotype and an immunodeficiency phenotype. The enteropathy phenotype includes autoimmune enteropathy, IBD/IBD (inflammatory bowel disease)-like disease and non-infectious diarrhoea; the autoimmunity phenotype includes mainly AIHA (autoimmune haemolytic anaemia) and/or ITP (immune thrombocytopenic purpura); and the immunodeficiency phenotype includes combined immunodeficiency, combined variable immune deficiency (CVID) and a CVID-like disease. There does not appear to be any genotype-phenotype correlation.8

LRBA deficiency also include patients without hypogammaglobulinaemia described as clinically variable syndrome with a wide spectrum of manifestations.9 A systematic review of 109 LRBA deficient patients found that 24% of them had insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). The authors reported most frequent autoimmune complications in patients with LRBA deficiency to be AIHA, ITP, IDDM and IBD.10 Other studies reported diabetes in 22%–44.4% of patients presenting before 6 months of age to childhood.11 12 The index infant presented with autoimmune diabetes (anti-GAD-65 positive) at an early age (4 months). He did not have symptoms suggestive of other associated complications of LRBA deficiency (enteropathy, recurrent infections, organomegaly) as of now. Screening done for coeliac disease, autoimmune hypothyroidism, associated congenital malformations was normal in the index infant. Immunoglobulin profile and Treg assay were normal. In the index infant we have planned to monitor his HbA1c every 3 months and screening for autoimmune and immunological dysfunction yearly.

Various pharmacological immunosuppressive treatment strategies used to attenuate autoimmune symptoms of LRBA deficiency have been reported (eg, steroids, azathioprine, infliximab, mycophenolate mofetil, rituximab and sirolimus). In addition, regular IgG substitutions can be used in patients with hypogammaglobulinaemia.13 A very promising therapeutic approach is the CTLA4 modulation by abatacept, with which a dramatic and sustained clinical improvement has been reported in LRBA-deficient patients with life-threatening chronic organ manifestations such as severe restrictive lung disease or enteropathy.14

Patient’s perspective

I was shocked to learn about my child’s diagnosis. I was informed regarding the available laboratory test to confirm the diagnosis and treatment options. I am thankful for the support received from the treating doctors and staff.

Learning points

  • Neonatal diabetes mellitus (NDM) is the commonly used term to describe monogenic forms of diabetes that typically present within the first 6 months of life.

  • NDM is caused by one of more than 25 identified genetic mutations.

  • Genetic testing in NDM detects specific gene mutation and guides long-term management of associated complications of specific gene mutation.

  • LRBA deficiency should be considered in all patients presenting with NDM and signs of severe autoimmunity or immunodysfunction.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Footnotes

  • Contributors RK and AY were involved in the clinical management of case, conception of work, acquisition and drafting of work. RV contributed in the genetic analysis of index child and parents. AR guided the further laboratory work-up done. RK and AY were involved in drafting the manuscript and revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors have read the manuscript and approved it for final submission. All authors have agreed to be accountable for all aspect of the work in ensuring that questions related to accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer